Showing posts with label Companies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Companies. Show all posts

Monday, September 5, 2011

Some tax-resolution companies are scams

Monday, September 5, 2011
0 comments








Investors are often warned that if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Or in other words, if that guy on TV really made millions investing in real estate with no money down, why can't he afford a better toupee?





  • When hiring any type of tax professional consumers should investigate how reputable the company or individual is.

    By Tina Fineberg, AP


    When hiring any type of tax professional consumers should investigate how reputable the company or individual is.



By Tina Fineberg, AP


When hiring any type of tax professional consumers should investigate how reputable the company or individual is.






You should apply the same skepticism to ads from companies that claim they can make your tax debts disappear. The ads, which also flourish on the radio and the Internet, typically claim that good folks who run these companies will defend you against those big bad bullies at the IRS.


While there's no question that the IRS can make your life miserable, some tax-settlement companies could compound your tax woes, according to lawsuits filed by state and federal regulators. Some recent examples:


•In September, the Federal Trade Commission charged American Tax Relief of Beverly Hills with misrepresenting its ability to provide tax relief for thousands of customers. The FTC said most customers never got the promised tax relief, even though they paid "exorbitant fees." The FTC alleged that the company cheated consumers out of more than $60 million, which enabled the company's owners to amass an impressive collection of luxury cars.


Officials with American Tax Relief couldn't be reached for comment.


•Attorneys general in Texas and Minnesota have filed lawsuits against TaxMasters and its chief executive officer, Patrick Cox, for allegedly misleading customers about its ability to reduce their tax bills. In a lawsuit filed in December, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson charged that most of the "tax consultants" who answer calls to TaxMasters' toll-free number are sales representatives who often make unrealistic promises "in order to dupe consumers into paying thousands of dollars in advance fees."


TaxMasters declined to comment on the lawsuits.


•Earlier this month, a California superior court froze the assets of Roni Deutch, a tax attorney who promotes herself as the "Tax Lady" in late-night television commercials. The action came after California's then-attorney general, now governor, Jerry Brown charged Deutch with violating an earlier court order that directed her to repay dissatisfied customers. Last year, the attorney general's office charged that Deutch misled customers when she claimed she could help 99% of her clients resolve tax disputes with the IRS.


In a statement on her website, Deutch called the complaint "election year politics" and said she was cooperating with the attorney general's office. Last week, she said she planned to file for bankruptcy and closed her office.


Red flags to watch for


There are reputable tax professionals who can help you resolve problems with the IRS, and in some instances, reduce your tax bill. How to identify those that aren't looking out for your best interests:


•Large upfront fees and high-pressure sales tactics. Consumers who hired American Tax Relief services were charged fees ranging from $3,200 to $25,000, according to the FTC. Fees for TaxMasters range from $1,500 to $9,000, according to the Texas attorney general, while Deutch's customers were charged $1,600 to $4,700.


American Tax Relief customers were required to make their payments over the phone, either with their credit card or with debits from their bank accounts, the FTC says.


Consumers who call TaxMasters for a "free consultation" get few details about the service unless they agree to pay a fee, according to the complaint filed by the Texas attorney general's office. According to the lawsuit, customers who request a written description of services are told that it's not possible to generate the documents until they make a payment.


•No face-to-face consultation. If a tax settlement company insists on conducting all business by phone, the company is probably more interested in signing up lots of customers than providing good service, regulators say. Deutch's firm, for example, conducted all business by phone, even for customers who lived near the firm's office in Sacramento County, according to the California attorney general's office.


•Guaranteed results. Beware of any tax-settlement company that promises it will reduce your tax debts. While there are legitimate IRS programs for taxpayers who can't pay, only the IRS can determine whether you're qualified.


Similarly, you should avoid any company that claims it can stop IRS collection efforts. Consumers who contacted Deutch's firm were told that once they gave it power of attorney over their tax debt, the IRS would no longer be allowed to collect on those debts, according to the California attorney general's complaint. Those customers were subsequently hit with wage garnishments, bank levies and federal tax liens, the complaint says.


No easy solutions


Tax-settlement companies often promote their inside knowledge of IRS tax-relief programs. What they often don't tell you is that the bar to qualify for some of these programs is extremely high. The most common tax-relief programs:


•Offer in compromise. Under the program, the IRS agrees to accept less than you owe. But to obtain a permanent reduction in your tax debt, it's not enough to show the IRS that you can't pay your tax bill. You must also prove you've exhausted all of your financial resources and have little hope of raising money in the future.


"People see these TV ads and get the impression you can dicker with the IRS," says Steven Baker, director of the FTC's Midwest region. "The reality is they're going to take almost every asset you've got."


•Penalty abatement. If you're behind on your taxes, you probably owe the IRS late-payment penalties, in addition to interest. In some cases, the IRS will reduce or eliminate those penalties, says Danny Snow, a certified public accountant in Memphis.


However, the IRS won't grant penalty abatement without reasonable cause, Snow says. For example, a widow who filed her tax return late because her husband died shortly before April 15 might qualify for penalty abatement, he says.


You don't need to hire a tax-settlement company to seek penalty abatement, Snow says. If you believe you can show extenuating circumstances, you can apply on your own or ask your tax preparer to file a request on your behalf, he says.


•Installment agreements. Under an installment plan, you make monthly payments on your tax debt for up to five years. But this is something you can do on your own. The fee to set up an installment plan is $105, or $52 if you agree to have payments automatically debited from your bank account. Approval is automatic for taxpayers who owe $10,000 or less and are in good standing with the IRS.


If you cant pay


Tax-settlement companies have flourished during the economic downturn because a lot of desperate people have tax bills they can't pay. Sadly, though, victims of unscrupulous tax relief firms have ended up even deeper in debt.


If you owe the IRS money, you have options:


•Talk to a CPA or enrolled agent who has experience dealing with IRS collection issues. If you already have a tax preparer, he or she may be able to help you or refer you to someone who can.


•If you can't afford to hire a tax professional, you may qualify for a Low-Income Tax Clinic. To find one near you, go to the website for the IRS Taxpayer Advocate, irs.gov/advocate.


•If you have tried unsuccessfully to resolve your problems with the IRS, you may be able to get help from the Taxpayer Advocate's office. For more information, go to irs.gov/advocate, or call 877-777-4778.


Sandra Block covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Her Your Money column appears Tuesdays. E-mail her at: sblock@usatoday.com. Follow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sandyblock





Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

View the original article here


read more

Some companies hit the road for annual meetings

0 comments








NEW YORK ? When it's time for the annual meeting and things might get ugly, there's no place like the road.





  • In this May 6, 2011 file photo, a police officer escorts protesters from a Goldman Sachs office building in Jersey City, N.J. after they attempted to enter the financial company's shareholders meeting.

    Mark Lennihan, AP file


    In this May 6, 2011 file photo, a police officer escorts protesters from a Goldman Sachs office building in Jersey City, N.J. after they attempted to enter the financial company's shareholders meeting.



Mark Lennihan, AP file


In this May 6, 2011 file photo, a police officer escorts protesters from a Goldman Sachs office building in Jersey City, N.J. after they attempted to enter the financial company's shareholders meeting.






Marshall & Illsley, a 164-year-old Wisconsin bank, usually meets with shareholders each April in its hometown of Milwaukee. But that was before the bagpipe-playing firefighters and marching teachers descended on its branches by the thousands earlier this year to protest contributions from executives to Gov. Scott Walker. And it was before the board decided to sell the bank to a Canadian company, a deal that includes $65 million in severance for those same executives.


M&I postponed its regular annual meeting and decamped for New York, 900 miles away, for a hasty special meeting last week. It would be the bank's last shareholders' meeting — and it only lasted seven minutes. Attendees say executives promised to take questions at the end but never did, and exited quickly through a back door after holding a vote to approve the acquisition by BMO Finance Group, the parent of the Bank of Montreal.


"How can shareholders cast an informed vote if the executives acting on their behalf fail to answer basic questions?" says Daniel Pedrotty, director of the office of investment for the AFL-CIO, which has some members with retirement money invested in M&I through pension funds.


Executives of publicly traded companies are required to face their investors once a year at annual meetings, typically in the spring. These meetings allow shareholders — ranging from investing clubs made up of grandmas to large pension funds — to see and question the CEO and other top executives. For small shareholders, it's likely the only chance to get face time with a company's leaders.


While moving a meeting isn't a new phenomenon, these annual events are most often held in the city where a company is headquartered, or in Delaware, where many of them are incorporated. Sometimes a company might hold its annual shareholder confab in a location where it has a strong business presence, a significant number of employees or a new partner.


But critics say going on the road is also one way companies under fire can hide from angry investors and avoid confrontations with shareholders and protesters. In many cases, the strategy has worked, with fewer people making the trek to attend far-flung meetings.


"Companies should hold meetings where you get the maximum number of shareholders," says Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for corporate governance at the University of Delaware. "If you don't want people to attend or protest, you choose an inconvenient location."


A few other companies on the move this year:


•AMR, parent of American Airlines, held its meeting in Los Angeles. About 50 flight attendants showed up to protest, nowhere near the hundreds of angry attendants, pilots and mechanics — upset with executives who take big bonuses while union contract negotiations have dragged on since 2008 — that AMR usually draws when it holds meetings in Fort Worth, Texas, where it is headquartered.


Goldman Sachs Group held its meeting outside New York for the first time, opting for New Jersey. Goldman moved into a new, 43-story, steel and glass building with 2.1 million square feet in downtown Manhattan in 2010, but said an auditorium in Jersey City had more room for shareholders. The space was only half-filled. In the last several years, Goldman's New York offices have been the target of large protests over anger about large payouts for top executives and the company's role in the mortgage meltdown.


JPMorgan Chase, the nation's second-largest bank, held its annual meeting in Columbus, Ohio. Although the bank has 17,000 employees working there, the most outside of New York, its headquarters in Manhattan has been a target of thousand-person protests. About 400 demonstrators still showed up in Columbus, railing against the bank's handling of mortgage foreclosures.


At an annual meeting, executives make presentations and shareholders elect directors to the board and vote on proposals that require their approval. Investors can also vote online. The meetings are the only forum where many shareholders get to air their views on practices and policies of the company directly to corporate executives and directors.


It can be unpleasant for executives, who often face a harsh audience and tough questions about everything from pay to business decisions. At Bank of America's auditorium in Charlotte, N.C., where the company is based, CEO Brian Moynihan was visibly squirming on stage during the May 11 annual meeting as he tried to hurry 18 people who had lined up on the two sides of the auditorium's red velvet seats to speak to him. Several berated him for the bank's handling of the foreclosure crisis. For example, Liana Molina, an organizer for the California Reinvestment Coalition, a non-profit group, told Moynihan it wasn't surprising that "B of A is dubbed as Bad for America."


Given such anger, it's no wonder some companies might want to escape, say shareholder activists — even if it's just across a river. Lance Lindblom, CEO of the Nathan Cummings Foundation, a longtime shareholder of Goldman Sachs, says the financial crisis has put a spotlight on the company and led to regular protests outside its New York headquarters. Moving to Jersey City curtails the number of protesters who show up, he says.


"The Hudson River acts as a moat to keep some of them away," Lindblom says.


Goldman's meeting in Jersey City drew about 250 people and fewer protesters than in the past. A Goldman spokesman said the space was more conducive to an annual meeting, but wouldn't say whether there was an auditorium of the same size in the company's new building in New York. Its meeting had traditionally been held a few blocks away from its headquarters.


AMR says it is holding meetings in its "cornerstone" cities, where most of its flights originate. But in the two years since the road meetings began, the move has also had the effect of keeping away union protesters. In the past, hundreds of uniformed pilots and flight attendants would line up outside the annual confab just south of Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, near the company's headquarters, to protest rich management stock bonuses and labor contract issues.


"In Dallas, you're always going to get a good crowd," says Laura Glading, president of the Association of Professional Flight Attendants. "In LA, we were just hoping to have a presence."


As for Wisconsin's M&I, spokeswoman Sara Schmitz wouldn't say whether the bank has ever held a shareholder meeting in New York. She would only say the bank commonly holds its "business-only" meetings in New York. While shareholders and angry union groups based in the Midwest say the move made it harder for them to attend, the bank didn't avoid confrontation altogether. About 1,000 protesters from local unions showed up at the May 17 meeting, according to attendees.


Companies aren't required to allow questions at shareholder meetings, but most do. Some companies limit the time allotted for questions at their meetings. Others allow for hours of questioning and make their executives available to meet one-on-one with shareholders. For example, Warren Buffett and other Berkshire Hathaway executives regularly answer dozens of shareholder questions over several hours during the company's annual meeting, which attracts some 40,000 shareholders. This year was no different, despite negative news about questionable stock sales by a recently departed executive.


And not every company is running away from home. General Motors will hold its first annual meeting since 2008, its last before it went into bankruptcy and government ownership, and will do so in Detroit. Previously, for more than a decade, it held its meetings in Wilmington, Del. Spokeswoman Renee Rashid-Merem said that besides cost savings by holding the meeting locally, it also showed that GM is committed to its home city. After bankruptcy and a $50 billion rescue package from the U.S. government, the company went public again this year. It's making money and sales are up.


"Given all that the company and our stakeholders have gone through to rebuild General Motors, we felt it was most appropriate to hold our first post-IPO meeting here in Detroit," Rashid-Merem says.


———


AP Business Writers Tom Krisher in Detroit, David Koenig in Dallas and Kelvin Chan in Hong Kong contributed to this story.


Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Posted












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

View the original article here


read more

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Companies' profits march 17% higher

Saturday, May 7, 2011
0 comments








Not even rising oil prices, it seems, can dampen U.S. companies' surging profits.





  • Rising energy and gas prices have not eaten into corporate profits so far.

    By Rick Bowmer, AP


    Rising energy and gas prices have not eaten into corporate profits so far.



By Rick Bowmer, AP


Rising energy and gas prices have not eaten into corporate profits so far.






The roughly three-quarters of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index that have released their first-quarter results have reported 17% higher profits in total, marking the sixth quarter in a row of higher earnings.


The results surprised some analysts who had braced for bad news because of economic problems caused by the tsunami in Japan, rising oil prices and political turmoil in the Middle East.


"Looking at the issues we've had, earnings have been somewhat amazing," says S&P's Howard Silverblatt. "Earnings are holding up this stock market."


The strong bottom line reported by companies has yet to filter down to workers and the labor market. Private industry wages and salaries in first quarter grew 0.4%, and unemployment is 8.8% in the face of slow job growth. On Friday, the Labor Department issues its unemployment survey for April. Companies are sitting on a record $940 billion in cash but have been reluctant to invest it in new operations and jobs.


The quarter's earnings reports also:


Provide signs of stronger growth. Companies' revenue rose 10%, the first quarterly double-digit increase since the first quarter of 2006, Silverblatt says.


Exhibit strong growth from some industries. Seven in 10 companies have beaten profit expectations, S&P says. Some industries did even better: 95% of health care companies topped profit forecasts, FactSet says.


Ease fears about disruptions from recent news events. Going into the earnings reporting season, analysts feared problems in Japan could have hurt U.S. companies that rely on parts and goods from that region, says FactSet's John Butters. So analysts went into reporting season guarded, calling for 14% higher profit, Silverblatt says.


Earnings expectations continue to mount, a dangerous omen as energy and material costs rise. Analysts, as measured by S&P, have high hopes for companies this year, expecting them to post record earnings in the third quarter.


Unless prices of key materials fall, companies, unable to pass along higher costs, will see profits suffer and set the stock market up for a correction, says Mark Lamkin of Lamkin Wealth Management. Kellogg was an example Wednesday as it reported 12% lower quarterly profit as costs for ingredients rise.


"Commodity prices are starting to have an impact," Lamkin says. "We're setting up for disappointment in the second half."





Posted












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

View the original article here


read more

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Companies' profits march 17% higher

Thursday, May 5, 2011
0 comments








Not even rising oil prices, it seems, can dampen U.S. companies' surging profits.





  • Rising energy and gas prices have not eaten into corporate profits so far.

    By Rick Bowmer, AP


    Rising energy and gas prices have not eaten into corporate profits so far.



By Rick Bowmer, AP


Rising energy and gas prices have not eaten into corporate profits so far.






The roughly three-quarters of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index that have released their first-quarter results have reported 17% higher profits in total, marking the sixth quarter in a row of higher earnings.


The results surprised some analysts who had braced for bad news because of economic problems caused by the tsunami in Japan, rising oil prices and political turmoil in the Middle East.


"Looking at the issues we've had, earnings have been somewhat amazing," says S&P's Howard Silverblatt. "Earnings are holding up this stock market."


The strong bottom line reported by companies has yet to filter down to workers and the labor market. Private industry wages and salaries in first quarter grew 0.4%, and unemployment is 8.8% in the face of slow job growth. On Friday, the Labor Department issues its unemployment survey for April. Companies are sitting on a record $940 billion in cash but have been reluctant to invest it in new operations and jobs.


The quarter's earnings reports also:


Provide signs of stronger growth. Companies' revenue rose 10%, the first quarterly double-digit increase since the first quarter of 2006, Silverblatt says.


Exhibit strong growth from some industries. Seven in 10 companies have beaten profit expectations, S&P says. Some industries did even better: 95% of health care companies topped profit forecasts, FactSet says.


Ease fears about disruptions from recent news events. Going into the earnings reporting season, analysts feared problems in Japan could have hurt U.S. companies that rely on parts and goods from that region, says FactSet's John Butters. So analysts went into reporting season guarded, calling for 14% higher profit, Silverblatt says.


Earnings expectations continue to mount, a dangerous omen as energy and material costs rise. Analysts, as measured by S&P, have high hopes for companies this year, expecting them to post record earnings in the third quarter.


Unless prices of key materials fall, companies, unable to pass along higher costs, will see profits suffer and set the stock market up for a correction, says Mark Lamkin of Lamkin Wealth Management. Kellogg was an example Wednesday as it reported 12% lower quarterly profit as costs for ingredients rise.


"Commodity prices are starting to have an impact," Lamkin says. "We're setting up for disappointment in the second half."





Posted












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

read more