Monday, September 5, 2011

USA TODAY's Fund All-Stars: 20 top performers; see chart

Monday, September 5, 2011








If you're looking for a stock mutual fund, you've got 3,286 funds to peruse. And that's just funds that invest in U.S. stocks. Check out one a day and you'll be done by 2020.





  • L. to r.: Co-portfolio managers Eric Newman, Yan Liu, Richard Gates, Chao Chen, Kevin Gates; and senior analyst Kevin Byrnes of the TFS Small Cap fund.

    By Eileen Blass, USA TODAY


    L. to r.: Co-portfolio managers Eric Newman, Yan Liu, Richard Gates, Chao Chen, Kevin Gates; and senior analyst Kevin Byrnes of the TFS Small Cap fund.



By Eileen Blass, USA TODAY


L. to r.: Co-portfolio managers Eric Newman, Yan Liu, Richard Gates, Chao Chen, Kevin Gates; and senior analyst Kevin Byrnes of the TFS Small Cap fund.






To make matters more confusing, each fund will have sales literature (or a salesman) telling you how swell the fund is.


Want some help? We've chosen 20 U.S. stock funds — two from each of the nine major Morningstar categories and two funds that use alternative strategies — with seasoned managers who have generated above-average long-term returns, relative to the risks they take.


And they all have below-average expenses, meaning you keep more of your gains.


These aren't 20 FUNDS YOU MUST OWN TODAY! Or 20 FUNDS THAT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE! We don't do that. But they're solid funds with outstanding records — and that's a good place to start. And at the very least, you can see how to get from 3,286 funds to a reasonable number of candidates.




Winnowing down the pile


First, let's get rid of all the sector funds. While you may want an energy fund or a utility fund in your portfolio, sector funds aren't core holdings. Now we've reduced our candidates from 3,286 to 2,716.


Next, see how the funds have fared against their peers. With so many funds available, there's no reason to buy a fund with mediocre performance. And, while a fund that has performed well in the past will not necessarily do well on the future, funds with really rotten long-term records often stay rotten.


And you can't compare all funds to one index. Contrasting a small-company stock fund to the large-company Standard and Poor's 500-stock index is just silly. The S&P 500 has gained an average of just 2.82% a year the past decade, according to Morningstar. The S&P 600 Smallcap has gained 8.68% a year. If you use only the S&P 500 for your yardstick, you'd own only small-cap and midcap funds.


So to winnow down our potential All-Stars, we looked for funds that had beaten funds in the same category for the past one, three and five years. Now our universe of funds is down to 589.


The next question: How much risk did these funds take to beat their competitors? A fund with high risk, relative to returns, is an invitation to a meltdown at some point.


One way is to look at a measure called alpha, which shows how a fund has performed, given the risks it takes. Funds with an alpha higher than zero have gained more than one would expect, given its risks. All the All-Stars have positive alpha, and that requirement brings down our list of candidates to 397.


Experience matters


We also require that a fund's manager be at the helm at least five years, and preferably more. Experience doesn't guarantee success — there are plenty of long-term laggards — but it's nice to know that your manager has seen a bear market before. In addition, we prefer funds where the manager has his cash in the fund as well.


Again, it's no guarantee of outperformance, but it's nice to know that you and your manager have a stake in the fund.


Finally, we look for large and midcap funds with expense ratios of less than 1.5%, and small-cap funds with expense ratios of less than 2%. Small funds, particularly small funds that invest in small-company stocks, tend to have higher expenses than larger ones.


It's perfectly possible to lose money — lots of it — with a cheap fund. On the other hand, it's difficult for any manager to beat the competition while paying high expenses. All other things being equal, we prefer All-Stars that take less and leave you with more.


We chose two funds from each of the nine major Morningstar categories, and two wild card choices. The first, Wasatch Long/Short fund, buys stocks it likes and sells short the stocks it doesn't. (Short selling is a way to bet that a stock's price will go down.) The other, GRT Value, is run by three managers with excellent histories running other funds.


Sorting the stars


The All-Stars come in three basic investment styles:


•Growth funds look for stocks of companies with the potential for high earnings growth. If earnings grow rapidly, they reason, stock prices will, too. "Tons of innovation happens in our country," says Michael Lippert, manager of Baron Opportunity fund. Companies with new, disruptive or transformative businesses are likely to see their earnings and share prices grow — or be acquired, Lippert says.


Growth funds can achieve spectacular gains: Baron Opportunity soared 43% the three months ended December 2001, according to Morningstar. But they can also get clobbered: The fund fell 41% in the three months ended November 2008.


•Value funds look for beaten-up, unloved stocks and hope that they will return to fair value. These funds often get left behind in red-hot markets, but usually hold up well in bear markets. The California Investment Equity-Income fund, for example, invests in dividend-paying stocks that are low in price, relative to earnings.


•Blend funds try to strike a balance between growth and value, looking for stocks of growing companies that sell for a reasonable price.


Generally speaking, conservative investors should look for funds that use a value approach to buying in large-company stocks. Want to be more aggressive? Look for a growth fund that buys small-cap stocks.


The funds are also divided according to the size of the company stocks they buy. Large-cap funds buy stocks of companies whose stock is worth a total of $11 billion or more. Small-cap companies have a market capitalization of $2.5 billion or less.


Which All-Stars you choose depends on your tolerance for risk, and the amount of time you have before you reach your goals. The less time you have, the more conservative you should be, because you may not be able to recover from losses.


You can also use them to augment a low-cost index fund strategy. Use the index fund as your main holding, and an All-Star fund as a way to increase your exposure to specific investment styles.

USA TODAY's 2011 All-Star Mutual Funds






























































































































































































































These funds, all with seasoned managers,
have outperformed their peers for the past 1,3 and 5 years, according to
Morningstar. Look for funds that fit your tolerance for risk -- and be sure
to diversify your overall portfolio with bond funds, cash, and international
funds.
   

     
Fund Name, ticker















BBH Core Select, BBTRX















Gabelli Asset A, GATAX















Wells Fargo Advantage Growth A, SGRAX















Alger Spectra A, SPECX















California Investment Equity Income A, EQTAX















Vanguard Equity-Income, VEIPX















Royce Value, RVVHX















GRT Value, GRTVX















Baron Opportunity, BIOPX















Westcore Select, WTSLX















Delafield Fund, DEFIX















Hotchkis and Wiley Value Opps A, HWAAX















TFS Small Cap, TFSSX















Parnassus Small-Cap, PARSX















MFS New Discovery A, MNDAX















Conestoga Small Cap, CCASX















Homestead Small Company Stock, HSCSX















SouthernSun Small Cap, SSSFX















Calamos Growth & Income A, CVTRX















Wasatch Long/Short, FMLSX


















Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

View the original article here

0 comments:

Post a Comment